News and research
Dogs: Behaviour and Training
SUMMARIES OF ARTICLES ABOUT DOGS
We've given you two headlines, the first (in blue)
being the original, and the second (in red) aims to be a more informative
headline, so you can gain an idea of what the article is about more quickly.
The source is also given in case you want to track down the original article.
See also:
 Dogs:
Effect on human mental and physical health
Dogs:
Health, disease and physiology
Dogs:
General
Reviews
of Dog books, including books on health and behaviour
Books on Animal Behaviour including Animal Coginition
Some cute little Westies like to bark a lot. Watercolour,
painted by David Simon
Click on the picture to see me better
Follow your nose
How dogs may perceive scent
source: New Scientist vol 211 no 2826, August 20 2011 starts p36, 2 pages long
Dogs may experience strong smells in a different way from humans, perceiving them as layers, with different sorts of information. Alexandra Horowitz of Columbia University, New York, sees dogs as able to perceive scent in a complex way, rather than as mono-smells. Dogs use visual cues as back-ups. Police tracker dogs rely on their noses, ignoring the visual cue of footprints. Just one object may offer different sorts of information, according to Horowitz. Dogs may sense the time that has passed since smells were left, so have a sense of time. Dogs' nostrils are far enough apart for them to smell from different regions and work out the direction of a smell. Dogs have 300 million olfactory receptors. Humans have six million. The olfactory cortex of dogs accounts for 12.5% of total brain mass, but in humans it is only 1%.
DO,BT
 Top
of page
The babysitters' club
Shared childcare fosters co-operation and altruism in social animals like wolves and dogs
source: Mairi MacLeod
New Scientist vol 209 no 2804, March 19 2011 starts p48, 4 pages long
Some researchers believe that shared childcare encourages co-operation and altruism in certain species. In humans this also helped foster language, technology and culture. Humans can collaborate in teams, read emotion in others, and may even be kind to strangers. Captive marmosets show more altruism than chimps, when able to pull food in the direction of a neighbour's cage. Marmosets are co-operative breeders, while chimps are independent breeders. Infants in co-operative societies may survive better if they can judge non-related adults. Elephants are also co-operative breeders, as are African wild dogs. Wolves also share water and food, and may help disabled or injured members of a group.
Domestic dogs are descended from wolves, and perform better on tasks such as imitation in comparison with animals that have simuilar sized brains. Researchers have observed dogs consoling victims after fights. Socio-cognitive tasks, like imitation, also include gaze understanding and social learning. Co-operative breeders donate information as well as food, in other words they are teachers. Tamarins bring young dead insects, then live prey, then show where prey is hidden, according to the youngsters' ability. Matrilineal groups may also encourage co-operative breeding because adults in a group are related to the young.
DO,BT
Top
of page
Puppy Power! Using social cognition research tasks to improve socialization practices for domestic dogs (Canis familiaris)
Cognition research and the socialization of puppies
Source: Howell, T., and Bennett, P
Journal of Veterinary Behavior: Clinical Applications and Research, 6 (3): May 2011 p195-204
Recent research with dogs has shown that they are extremely effective at communicating with humans. They can follow human pointing gestures to find treats or toys; they can look at their owner as if requesting assistance to solve a problem that they cannot solve on their own; and, they even use eye contact to ‘show’ their owner the location of a treat or toy that they want to access. Dogs also learn to perform certain actions by watching other dogs or humans performing them. All of these skills are of real interest to animal behavior and cognition researchers, but few dog owners are surprised by any of these revelations.
Our paper reviews five experimental setups used in dog cognition research to test for the skills mentioned above. We suggest how they could be modified for use in homes, as tasks for puppies to practice both in the litter and in their new home. Three of the tasks are designed to encourage eye contact with the owner, and the other two are observational learning tasks, or learning by watching others. Dogs tend to develop these skills over the course of their lifetime anyway, as shown by their success in these kinds of tests as adults. We propose that training puppies in these skills could provide a sort of ‘fast-track’ to the knowledge they possess as adult dogs. This could help improve the dog-owner relationship because, a. the owners and breeders are given specific, but simple, tasks that will encourage fun interactions with the dog on a regular basis, and b. these tasks are all designed to teach the dog to watch and make eye contact with their owner. Eye contact between owner and dog has been shown to activate neurochemicals that are related to bonding, so these tasks might provide the opportunity to strengthen the bond between dog and owner early and often. It is our hope that this strong, early bond would reduce the number of dogs surrendered to shelters and euthanized.
We wrote this article partly because of a criticism that some members of the community have toward dog cognition research: it doesn’t tell them anything new. The field of dog cognition research is less than 15 years old. There were researchers studying dog behavior earlier in the 20th century, but after Scott and Fuller’s landmark puppy research in the 1960s, there has been very little follow up until the late 1990s. Because the field is so young, and science is necessarily slow, in some ways the field is ‘catching up’ to the knowledge that lay people have about dog behavior. There are a few studies that are particularly inspired and really tell people something new and interesting, but it will probably be a few more years before the scientific community can regularly contribute surprising or unexpected information to the lay community about dogs. This review article synthesizes existing knowledge in a way that might be beneficial to members of the dog-loving community. A portion of the article also stresses the need for more puppy research within the dog cognition field.
If you would like more information about the article or the tasks set out within it, please email me at tiffani.howell@monash.edu
Top
of page
Border collie is fluent in toyspeak
Border collie's linguistic skills
source: Jessica Griggs
New Scientist vol 208 no 2792/2793, 25th December 2010 p8
Chaser, a border collie, has learnt 1,022 words for different items. She was taught by John Pilley and Alliston Reid, psychologists from Wofford College, S Carolina. Chaser learnt names through fetching toys, and each time she was correct in her selection, the name of the toy was repeated. She also fetched toys from a separate room, so researchers could not give her unintentional cues. Her score was never under 18 correct selections out of 20 commands to select. She can also categorise named objects, touch toys with her paw or nose, and work out what a new object is called when placed among familiar objects, through eliminating the names of the familiar objects.
Adam Miklosi, who has set up the Family Dog Project in Hungary's Etvos Lorand University, sees Chaser's intensive training as the key to her good performance, not yet matched by other dogs. He notes that, while Chaser can understand human speech, she cannot produce it.
DO,BT
Top
of page
Animal empathy
Dogs and cats can develop empathy for humans
source: Mike Flattley
New Scientist vol 208 no 2791, 18th December 2010 p28
Humans can hunt more effectively when they can think like the prey they hunt, as is shown by the Kalahari bushmen. Anthropologists see this skill as part of the evolution of the human ability to develop strategies and influence events. More empathic predators are probably better hunters, and this may apply to cats and dogs. Both can understand human behaviour to some extent, and this has helped them to co-operate and live with humans. Cats and dogs behave differently when they relate to their own species. It is anthropomorphic to believe that only humans can understand others' behaviour. Evolution is likely to have favoured empathy as a useful survival trait.
DO,BT
Top
of page
Why dogs and their owners are so alike
Dogs learn better when they imitate humans
source: New Scientist vol 207 no 2771, 31 July 2010 p116
Humans tend to copy other humans' behaviour, often unconsciously, for example, yawning when somebody else yawns. Dogs may also copy humans. A team from the University of Vienns, Austria, investigated dogs trained to open a sliding door. One group were trained to use their mouths, and the other to use their paws. The dogs found this task easier if their trainer opened the door using the method the dogs were taught. This result was first reported in Proceedings of the Royal Society, B, DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2010.1142.
Top
of page
Dogs know that stealth pays when your eyes are averted
Dogs can understand how humans perceive them
source: New Scientist vol 207 no 2770, 24 July 2010 p16
Researchers from Hood College, Frederick, Maryland, argue that dogs can understand how humans pereceive them. They first trained 40 dogs to leave food put on a plate. Then the dogs had access to two containers with food inside. One container had loud bells, the other had
muted bells. The dogs took food from either container when they were observed. However, they chose the quieter container when the observer was not looking at them. This research was first reported in Applied Animal Behaviour Science, vol 126 p45.
DO,BT
Top
of page
Disgruntled dogs opt out of unfair play
Dogs appear to have a concept of fairness
source: Nora Schultz
New Scientist 13 Dec 2008 vol 200 no 2686 p12
Dogs that think they are being treated unfairly compared to their canine companions show their feelings. Scientists have previously found that primates dislike unfair treatment and wondered whether other species characterised by cooperative living might have a similar dislike.
Dogs were tested by a team led by Friedericke Range from Vienna University, Austria. The subjects were 43 trained dogs, who held out their paws to humans on request, whether or not they were rewarded, or were alone, or with another companion dog. This changed if one dog was rewarded and the other was not. The dog that was not given a reward complied with the request on average a third less than when alone or when neither or both dogs were rewarded. The unfairly treated dogs also showed their unhappiness by scratching or licking themselves. Range speculates that a sense of unfair exclusion may also help in understanding why some dogs appear to envy their owners' new human babies.
University of Colorado's Marc Bekoff argues that a sense of unfairness is important for wolves and coyotes, since freeloaders can jeopardise the survival of the pack.
DO,BT
Top
of page
Who's a clever boy then?
Recent research on canine cognition
source: Kate Douglas
New Scientist vol 199 no 2670, August 23 2008
starts p 33, 3 pages long
The first Canine Science Forum was held in Budapest, Hungary, in July 2008. One issue discussed was canine cognition. Previously many scientists believed that dogs were more stupid versions of wolves, since their brains are some 10% smaller than those of wolves. Now it is more accepted that domestication has affected canine cognition, for example, dogs appear to have a rudimentary sense of right and wrong, according to University of Colorado's Marc Berkoff. He has studied play in dogs and other animals, and sees play as a way of learning social rules. Meanwhile, University of Vienna's Friederike Range argues that dogs also have an aversion to inequity. In her experiments, dogs ceased to cooperate when not rewarded in the same way as other dogs, for successfully perfoming the same task. Inequity is a value that helps counter freeloading, so promotes social stability.
Dogs have learnt to communicate with humans through barking, argues Peter Pongracz, from Budapest's Eotvos Lorand University. Dog barks can convey emotional states like happiness, aggression and lonliness, and these states can be recognised from barks even by non-dog owning children. Dogs can also understand human attempts to communicate with them, for example through gazing and pointing, as well as through information from human voices. Dogs can also be trained to identify and retrieve toys by name, according to University of Cambridge's Juliane Kaminski. Furthermore, the Hungarian Academy of Science's Joszef Topal sees dogs as capable of learning from one another.
There are debates as to how recent research should be interpreted, including the notion that dogs may have a theory of mind. However, this idea is now more acceptable than it was some years ago.
DO,BT
Top
of page
Effect of DAP and other factors on night time disturbances and house soiling by newly adopted puppies
source: K Taylor and D.S. Mills
Applied Animal Behaviour Science vol 105, no 4, July 2007,
starts p358, 11 pages long
New owners of puppies often have to cope with the pups disturbing them at night, crying and scratching repeatedly, and with soiling, or going to the toilet at night. A study of 60 pups, 25 of which were gundog breeds, has sought to test whether dog appeasing pheromone (DAP) may help, and to find out what other factors may be important. The pups were split into two groups, with 30 sleeping in rooms with a DAP diffuser, and 30 in rooms with a placebo diffuser. The other factors looked at by the researchers included whether the pups slept alone or with other dogs, whether the pups came from a domestic or a non-domestic setting when they lived with their previous owners, and whether the new owners crated the pups at night.
Most of the pups, ie 71%, disturbed their owners the first night, and this fell to 22% by the 7th night. There were 11 pups which slept with the owners' other dog or dogs, and these 11 pups were much less likely to disturb their owners, even during the first night. The dogs they slept with may have provided natural DAP. The DAP diffusers were especially effective in reducing the tendency of gundog pups to disturb their owners, Gundog pups without DAP in the diffusers were more likely than other breeds to disturb their owners, perhaps because gundogs are bred to be sociable. DAP had little or no effect on the non-gundogs' tendency to cry or scratch, though, whatever the breed, pups with a tendency to disturb were less likely to do so if they had DAP in the diffuser.
Most of the pups soiled the first night, ie 84% of them. This fell to 65% on the 7th night, 59% on the 14th, and 45% on the 28th. DAP diffusers appeared to have no effect on whether or not the pups soiled. What did appear to have an effect was crating. About half the pups were crated at night, ie 29, with 31 loose in a room, and crated pups soiled for a median of 10 nights in all, compared with 30 for uncrated pups. Coming from a domestic environment also helped. The 25 pups from a domestic environment soiled for a median of 16 nights in all, while the 35 from a non-domestic environment soiled for a median of 30, during the study period.
Crating may be effective because pups are constrained in terms of exercise, as well as feeling inhibited about soiling their den. Previous owners in a domestic environment may have put pups out with their dam, so helping the pups to become house trained before they went to their new homes.
DO,BT
Top
of page
It's good to bark
Barking as a way for dogs to communicate with humans
source: Kate Douglas
New Scientist vol 182 no 2451, June 12 2004
starts p 552, 2 pages long
Humans and dogs have lived close to each other for between 15,000 and 30,000
years, and communication between the two species may have developed in this
time. Barking was once seen as having little meaning, but it may be that it
uses similar patterns to human speech, giving humans a greater ability to understand
dogs than our ability to understand other species.
Barking is not apparently used much as a way for wild canids, like jackals,
foxes and wolves, to communicate with one another. They do communicate with
sound, for example, howling and whining, but generally it is only used by juveniles
when they play. Dogs were thought to bark as a result of preserving juvenile
traits.
Research by Dorit Feddersoen-Petersen, from Kiel's Christian-Albrechts University
in Germany, has found that dog barks differ from those of wolves. Dogs have
more variable barks, in terms of length, and in terms of having both harmonic
and atonal sounds. Wolves tend to have short, atonal, gruff and low-pitched
barks.
Dogs also bark differently according to context. They are likely to bark noisily
and atonally when they feel physically distressed or socially insecure, while
positive social interactions, like playing, seem linked to more harmonic barks.
Further research, this time from University of California Davis, backs this
finding. Sophia Yin examined acoustical analyses for 10 dogs, and over 4,600
barks, focusing on three situations, a doorbell ring by a stranger, being isolated
from the owner, and play. Low-pitched, harsh, rapid barks were linked to doorbells
ringing, isolation was linked to high-pitched barks, and play to unevenly spaced,
tonal barks.
Meanwhile, Adam Miklosi, from Budapest University, Hungary, has found that
humans are able to guess the reason for why a dog is barking, even if the humans
are non-dog owners. His study used 10 herding dogs, mudis, which are notoriously
vocal, and 90 humans, one group of which owned mudis, a second of which owned
other breeds, and the third did not own dogs at all. The humans assessed the
dogs' barks for emotions, such as happiness, aggression, fear, despair, or playfulness,
and were also asked to link the bark to one of a choice of seven situations.
The humans guessed the situation correctly around a third of the time, and had
an accuracy rate of around 45% when they categorised barks. This level of accuracy
is better than could have been achieved by chance, and all three human groups
performed well. Humans seem to have an innate ability to understand dogs.
Mammals may have some acoustical patterns in common, argues Cornell University's
Michael J. Owren, and he goes on to note that his research shows how cats can
meow in a way that attracts owners' attention. The trait of being able to communicate
in this way may have been selected for in both cats and dogs. Dogs have even
greater abilities than cats, since their repertoire is greater, and they can
vary volume, pitch, tone, duration, and the length of time between one bark
and another.
Miklosi is unsure as to whether humans selected this trait of being able to
communicate in dogs, but humans do appear to be able to infer a range of messages
that dogs send us. Dogs are less dumb than some people think.
DO, BT
Click here for books by Adam Miklosi
Top
of page
Retrospective analysis of the treatment of firework fears
in dogs
Dog appeasing pheromones and sound recordings can both help
to tackle dogs' fear of fireworks
source: D.S. Mills et al
Veterinary Record vol 153 no 18, November 1 2003
starts p 561, 2 pages long
There has been little work on the effectiveness of treatments for dogs that
suffer from fear of fireworks, though some work has been carried out on dog
appeasing pheromone (DAP) in a controlled study. This research examines the
effectiveness of three therapies, DAP, audio recording desensitisation, and
psychoactive drugs. The dogs came from an English vet practice, which developed
the sound recordings, and gave clients a CD with instructions on its usage.
The dogs' owners could choose between therapies, and combine them. They were
also given suggestions on the management of the dog when there were firework
sounds, for example they were told to ignore their dogs if the dogs showed
signs of anxiety.
The practice asked 200 owners to complete a questionnaire, and this yielded
48 usable returns, relating to 21 bitches and 27 dogs. These were 19 terrier-type
dogs, 11 pastoral breeds, nine gun dogs, six hounds, one utility, one toy,
and one that could not be classified. The mean age was 6.4 years, with a range
from three years-old to 13-years-old. of the total of 48 dogs. The average
(mean) length of time that the dogs had shown fear of fireworks was five years,
with a range between six months and 13 years. Fearful reactions to other noises
were noted by owners of 37 of the 48 dogs..
Psychoactive drugs (diazepam or acepromazine) were used by 14 owners, 32
used DAP, and 32 used the CD audio recording, with 21 owners using both DAP
and the CD. One notable result is that psychoactive drugs appear to be ineffective,
with no significance difference between dogs receiving these drugs, and dogs
not receiving them. Owners using these drugs also appeared less likely to
obey the instruction to ignore anxious dogs, and were also not as likely to
make sure their dogs were relaxed prior to putting on the CD, and not as likely
to use the CD every day. Medication should not be used in place of behaviour
therapy, and this research reinforces concerns that owners using such drugs
may be less compliant over instructions on ways to modify their dogs' behaviour.
Both DAP and CD sound recordings appear to be effective ways of tackling
dogs' fear of fireworks. Owners who used both DAP and the CD noted that the
dogs sought their owners less, became less vigilant, less restless, and salivated
less. Owners who used DAP alone did not report a significant reduction in
dogs seeking their owners or bolting. The results suggest that if owners want
to control these behaviours, DAP should be used together with systematic desensitisation.
There are a number of potential differences in the effects of these treatments.
Owners who used DAP alone, for example, reported a reduction in dogs' tendencies
to be startled, hide or vocalise, while owners who used the CD reported that
their dogs were less restless. More research is needed to investigate these
apparent differences between the effects of treatments. This study does indicate
that the problem of dogs fearing fireworks cannot be tackled just by prescribing
medication on its own.
DO, BT
Top
of page
Evaluation of dog-appeasing pheromone as a potential treatment
for dogs fearful of fireworks
Pheromone helps some dogs with fear of fireworks
source: G Sheppard and D.S. Mills
Veterinary Record vol 152, no 14, April 5 2003
starts p432, 5 pages long
Dogs may show fear of fireworks, for example by whining, panting, or running
away. Counter-conditioning of densitisation can be used, but may not be suitable
for all dogs. Seasonal stimuli that frighten dogs, like fireworks, may be
especially difficult to treat. Medication can also be used, but has to be
given in advance, and it is not always easy to tell when fireworks are going
to be let off. Medication may also fail to calm the dog, even if it changes
the dog's behaviour, and it can have side effects. This study tests dog appeasing
pheromone (DAP; Ceva Sante Animale) which is based on a synthetic mix of compounds
found in secretions from bitches just after they have given birth. The pheromone
is administered using an electric diffuser.
There were 30 dogs selected for this trial, and all had shown fear of fireworks,
with 19 of the 30 also afraid of thunder. Owners were asked how they dealt
with their dogs' fear, and 26 owners answered, with 18 trying to reassure
the dogs, and eight trying to distract or ignore them. The owners were given
advice on how to behave with their dogs when fireworks began, for example
not rewarding the dog by making a fuss of him, but 25 of the 26 owners said
that they did not change the way they treated their dogs as a result of this
advice.
The symptoms shown by the dogs included panting, affecting 29 dogs, and trembling,
affecting 28. After the treatment with pheromones, 22 owners noted an improvement,
and only five were mainly or very dissatisfied with the treatment.
The results should be interpreted with caution, due to the small size of
the sample, and there being no placebo control, however, dog-appeasing pheromone
does appear to help dogs which are afraid of fireworks.
DO.BT
Top
of page
Four cases of aggression and hypothyroidism in dogs
Hormone treatment decreases aggression in dogs with hypothyroidism
source: J. Fatjo et al
Veterinary Record vol 151 no 18, November 2 2002
starts p547, 2 pages long
Hypothyroidism is the most common canine endocrinological problem that vets
see, while aggression is the most common behavioural problem. Hypothyroidism
can lead to lethargy, apathy, and not being able to tolerate cold, but some
dogs may become more excited, and even aggressive. This study describes four
cases of dogs treated for hypothyroidism which was linked to aggression.
Three dogs of the four showed dominance-related aggression, eg when disturbed
during a meal, while the fourth showed fear aggression towards strangers.
The aggression in all these cases had been noted over a long period, and had
worsened. The dogs underwent thyroid function tests which suggested hypothyroidism.
The dogs were given levothyroxine at 12 hour intervals, and owners advised
to ensure that the dogs were not exposed to situations that could trigger
aggression. The dogs' doses were adjusted after periodical measurements of
their thyroid hormone levels. All four showed improvement after eight months,
though three of the dogs showed more improvement than the fourth.
Hypothyroidism is estimated to account for 1.7% of canine aggression cases,
so testing for hypothyroidism is indicated if dogs show aggression. Endocrinologists
tend to prefer tests measuring thyroxine levels with concentration of endogenous
thyroid-stimulating hormone.
Serotonin turnover can be affected by hypothyroidism, and serotonin is involved
in aggression control. Canine dominance aggression has been linked to low
brain serotonin levels. Aggression thresholds could be reduced by hypothyroidism.
One dog also growled when alone, and was reported to have suffered seizures.
A previous report noted a dog suffering from both seizures and hypothyroid
aggression.
DO,BT
Top
of page
The effectiveness of a citronella
spray collar in reducing certain forms of barking in dogs
Dogs tend to become habituated to citronella collars worn
all the time
Source: Deborah Wells
Applied Animal Behaviour Science 73 (2001)
Starts p299, 11 pages long
Dogs may bark as a warning, greeting, to attract attention, or for other
reasons, and this is often seen as a problem by owners. Citronella collars
release a spray which is triggered when a microphone detects the dog barking.
The interruption may surprise the dog enough for the owner to be able to get
the dog to do something else other than bark. The effectiveness of the collar
may depend on a number of factors, such as how it is worn, and why the dog
is barking.
This study involved 30 labrador retriever bitches referred to Queens University,
Belfast, for therapy. Ten of the dogs barked at the TV, ten barked when in
a car, and ten barked from their gardens at passing traffic. Half the dogs
in each group wore a citronella collar daily for 30 minutes, while half wore
the collar on alternate days for 30 minutes that day. The stimuli that triggered
barking were applied only during these 30 minute periods, for example, dogs
that barked in a car only went in a car for a 30 minute drive when they had
their collars on, while the TV barkers only watched TV with their collars
on. The dogs wore the collars for three weeks, and were observed with no collar
in the fourth week.
There was a reduction in barking in both groups, but it tended to wear off,
apparently because the dogs got used to the collar. The barking was reduced
more, and the effect of the collar wore off less quickly when dogs wore the
collar every other day, rather than when they wore it every day. This was
surprising because the spray is a form of punishment, and punishments tend
to be more effective when they are inevitable rather than intermittent. It
is unclear whether the dogs would eventually have got so used to the spray
that it would have had no effect on their barking, since the collar was only
worn for three weeks.
Dogs tended to bark more often when they were not wearing the collar, if
they were wearing the collar every day, which could be because they learnt
faster that they could bark without punishment. The dogs wearing the collar
every day wore it more often, so had more chance to learn when they could
bark unpunished. Both groups increased their barking in the fourth week, when
no collar was worn, but the barking was less than at the start of the experiment,
and the dogs that had worn the collar intermittently increased their barking
more slowly. The collar was also more effective with dogs that barked when
travelling in cars than with dogs that barked at TVs and passing traffic.
The owners were not told how to deal with barking, and were just told how
to use the collar. This was because the aim of the study was to assess the
collar. There are, however, recommendations that owners should direct their
dogs to do something else at the moment when the dog's barking is interrupted,
and this recommendation is worthy of further research.
Owners often buy citronella collars and leave them on their dogs all the
time because they don't have information on how to use them. This study indicates
that dogs get used to the collars, and the collars become less effective over
time, however they are used, but that they are effective for longer if used
intermittently.
DO,BT
Top
of page
Behavioural problems in cats and dogs
APBC review of cat and dog behavioural problems referred
in 2001
source: Veterinary Record vol 151 no 9, August 31 2002 p252
The Association of Pet Behavioural Counsellors (APBC) has issued a review
of feline and canine cases seen in 2001.
Indoor marking, mainly spraying, was the most common problem found with cats,
accounting for 25.5% of cases. Housetraining problems and aggression towards
people or other cats were also common cat problems. There was little difference
in numbers of male and female cats seen. The domestic shorthair was most common
cat breed seen, though this could be because it is the most common breed kept
in the UK.
Aggression shown towards humans accounted for 36% of cases of more than 1,000
dogs seen, with dog-dog aggression accounting for 19% and phobic and separation-related
problems each accounting for 9% of the total. Males were seen more often than
females. The breeds most commonly seen were crossbreeds, border collies and
German shepherds, though this could simply be because of these breeds are
common in the dog population of the UK as a whole.
DO,BT
Top
of page
Secret lives of dogs
Researchers believe that dogs can count and communicate
with barking
source: Hazel Muir and Betsy Mason
New Scientist August 3 2002 p20
Animal behaviourist, Robert Young, from Pontifical Catholic University of
Minas Gerais, Brazil, and Rebecca West from De Montfort University, Lincoln,
England, believe that dogs can count treats in a bowl. They used a technique
previously employed with babies, which involves letting the babies see dolls,
and then hiding the dolls with a screen, but letting the babies see researchers
apparently removing or adding some. The screen was then taken away. The babies
spent longer looking at the dolls when some had secretly been added or removed,
and they hadn't been able to watch this. Eleven mongrels were used in this
experiment, and doggie treats replaced dolls. The dogs did not stare as much
at the treats if there was one treat to start with, they saw one apparently
being added, and there was one more treat in the bowl when they got to see
the final result. The dogs did seem confused if there was one treat in the
bowl, the bowl was then hidden, and a treat apparently added, with the final
result being three treats. This implies that the dogs had done simple sums
in their heads.
Young argues that it could help dogs to be able to do maths, for example
because it could allow thm to work out how many enemies or allies they had.
Dogs are pack animals, with a large neocortex, a part of the brain involved
with reasoning.
Meanwhile, University of California, Davis's Sophia Yin has analyzed over
4,600 barks from 10 dogs of six breeds using sound spectrogram analysis. She
has found that dogs use different types of barks according to the situation
they are in. They tend to have a deeper bark for doorbell rings, and a higher
pitched bark when they are separated from their owners. She has been able
to assign a bark to a situation, just from the sound analysis, with 80% accuracy.
DO,BT
Top
of page
Aetiology of separation-related behavior in domestic
dogs
Two studies of separation anxiety in border collies and
labrador retrievers
source: J.W.S. Bradshaw et al
Veterinary Record vol 151 no 2 July 13 2002
starts p 43, 4 pages long
Some dogs may show separation anxiety by howling, and/or destroying furniture,
especially objects that smell of the owner, or that are near where the owner
left the house. Dogs may also eliminate, and even mutilate themselves. Some
15% of dogs are thought to suffer from this condition, and it has been seen
as possibly linked to rescue dogs, and dogs of mixed breeds are thought possibly
more vulnerable. Rescue dogs are more likely to be mixed breed dogs. Whether
or not behaviourists see cases depends a lot on how owners react, rather than
how severe the case is, so these two studies look at a general population
of dogs, rather than cases reported by owners to behaviorists.
The first study looked at 17 border collies and 23 labrador retrievers from
when they were born to 18-months-old. Their social experiences were examined,
especially their relationships with their owners. Information came from owners
and breeders. The second study used information from dog walkers stopped in
three locations in southern Hampshire. Information was collected on 105 dogs,
with 11 of these later excluded, since they were never alone. The median age
was four years, with the oldest being 18-years-old, and the youngest 3-months-old.
The labradors showed more separation anxiety at three and six-months-old,
but the collies and labradors showed similar results at 12 and 18-months-old.
13 Labradors of the total sample of 23 had problems with separation anxiety
that lasted over one month. Destructive dogs destroyed objects at exit and
entry points. Interaction levels with owners and breeders did not affect the
likelihood of separation anxiety developing. Dogs with most social referencing,
or a varied social experience, at age six-months to nine-months-old appeared
to be less likely to develop separation anxiety. However, dogs with very extensive
social referencing at age 3-months were more likely to develop problems when
they were between six and nine-months-old.
The problem was found in 29% of the dog walkers' dogs, or 27 of 94. Barking,
destructive behaviour and howling were the most common problems, with three
dogs reported to be defecating or urinating, and two reported as showing self-mutilation.
Eight dogs showed more than one problem behaviour. Six owners had sought professional
help. There appeared to be no link between neutering and whether a dog showed
this behaviour, or between whether a dogs was a pedigree or mixed-breed, and
separation anxiety. Rescue dogs did not appear to be more affected. Males
were three times as likely as bitches to show current separation anxiety,
and two thirds of bitches had never had the problem, while this applied to
only a third of males.
This sex link was not found in the longitudinal study, however, both studies
found the problem to be more common than the previously estimate of 15%. Rescue
dogs do not appear to be more vulnerable, nor do mixed-breed dogs, though
the number of mixed-breeds was quite small, with only 18 dogs. Previous studies
may have found rescue dogs apparently more vulnerable because owners of rescue
dogs may be more attached to them, so more likely to seek help. Mixed-breed
dogs may also be left home alone more.
The message from the longitudinal study seems to be that separation anxiety
can be prevented if dogs are given a wide social experience at between some
five and 10-months-old. Very extensive social experience in younger dogs appears
to have the opposite effect. However, this may be because the puppies may
come to expect a lot of varied social interaction, and suffer when they get
less varied and less frequent interaction. Pups do need varied interactions,
and a socially rich environment, and the problem of separation anxiety can
be avoided if they continue to have a varied interactions after they have
had their vaccinations and have gone to their new homes from the breeders.
It is also worth letting puppies learn to be separated from humans.
DO,BT
Top
of page
Wuff justice
Device to allow handlers to communicate with dogs at
a distance
source: New Scientist June 1 2002 p23
Temko of Tokyo has developed a device allowing handlers to control dogs at
a distance. The handler uses a loudspeaker transducer attached to the dog’s
head at the back, and this transducer sends sound to the dog’s eardrums
via its skull. The device could be helpful for handlers of rescue and police
dogs.
DO,BT
Top
of page
Teaching old dogs new tricks
Preparing cats and dogs for the arrival of a new baby
source: Beverley Cuddy
Guardian Weekend May 12 2001 p73
Dogs and cats can live harmoniously with new babies, so long as owners use
common sense and supervise them properly. However, parents are often under
pressure to give up their pets. The National Canine Defence League has discovered
that concerns relating to children and babies account for 15% of cases of
dogs being given up to their centres.
Dogs need to learn that there are new restrictions on where they can go in
the house, and they should be taught this before the arrival of the baby.
This means that the baby’s arrival is not linked to a loss of privileges.
Carrying round soft toys can help get dogs used to babies being carried around.
Owners should remove dog toys that appear similar to children’s toys.
Mothers-to-be can also invite friends round with babies, to accustom dogs
to the way babies smell and sound, and they can allow a dog to smell clothing
from a hospital-born baby, prior to that baby coming home.
Cats can be taught about babies in similar ways, and need teaching that they
should not go inside pushchairs and cots. Cats may show signs of stress when
babies arrive, and may urinate in the house.
Owners need to reduce the time spent with both cats and dogs before babies
arive, since otherwise jealousy is more likely to occur when owners have to
spend time on their babies, and can’t spoil their pets as much. Neither
dogs, nor cats should be left unsupervised with babies.
DO,BT
Top
of page
Owner characteristics and interactions and the prevalence
of canine behaviour problems
Links between owner characteristics and/or how owners
relate to their dogs, and the dogs’ behaviour
source: Andrew Jagoe and James Serpell
Applied Animal Behaviour Science vol 47 no 1-2, April 1996
starts p31, 12 pages long
Retrospective data have been used to assess links between canine behavioural
problems and owner behaviour, and/or the relationship between owners and dogs.
Statistically significant links emerged from this sample of 737 dogs for different
behaviour, such as a reduction in competitive aggression (aggression when
others are paid attention, or to other dogs in the home), roaming and escaping,
and problems relating to separation (eg urination, barking and destructiveness)
among dogs that had undergone obedience training. Obedience-trained dogs were
also seen as more overexcitable and disobedient - which may be because they
had been taken to classes precisely because of this problem. It is possible
that formal training does not help with these two problems.
There also appears to be a link between territorial aggression (eg towards
strange dogs, and people approaching the owner or dog) and dogs being fed
after their owners. No link was found between dominance aggression (eg aggression
when handled and disciplined) and feeding a dog prior to the owner.
Dogs sleeping near their owners seem more likely to have separation-related
problems and show competitive aggression. Dogs may, however, sleep near their
owners because they show separation-related problems, rather than having such
problems because they sleep near their owners.
First-time owners are more likely to have dogs with dominance-aggression,
problems relating to separation phobias relating to loud noises, and higher
degrees of excitability. This may be due to lack of experience in communicating
with dogs and handling them, or to breeds selected by first-time owners. Novice
owners may also see certain behaviour as problematic that experienced owners
do not see as a problem.
Competitive, dominance and territorial aggression also appear to be linked
to reasons why owners initially decided to acquire a dog. Dogs selected as
companions were less likely to show competitive aggression. Dogs chosen for
protection were more likely to show territorial aggression, which may be due
to breeds selected, types of behaviour encouraged, or how owners perceive
behaviour. Those chosen for exercise were less likely to show competitive
and dominance aggression, which may be because owners interact and lead more
with such dogs. Dogs chosen for showing and breeding showed less dominance
aggression, which may be due to training to accept invasive procedures.
It is not helpful to blame owners for problems shown by their dogs, but information
on possible links between how owners relate to their dogs, and their dogs’
behaviour, can both help us to understand canine-human relationships and suggest
better treatment for dogs when problems do arise.
DO,BT
Top
of page
Evidence for an association between pet behaviour and
owner attachment levels
Links between the behaviour of cats and dogs and levels
of attachment shown by their owners
source: James A. Serpell
Applied Animal Behaviour Science vol 47 no 1-2, April 1996
starts p49, 12 pages long
Behavioural problems are a common reason for people giving up pets to animals
shelters, but there has been little research into links between pets’
behavior and levels of owner attachment. Studies on attachment have tended
to focus on companionship as a benefit, or other areas which are not linked
to the animal’s behaviour. This survey, of 47 cat owners and 37 dog owners,
has investigated links between owner attachment levels and animal behaviour,
asking questions of owners a year after they had taken home cats or dogs from
two UK animal shelters.
The survey involved a postal questionnaire asking about the pets’ behaviour,
views of actual and ideal pets, and levels of attachment to their pets. No
owner described themselves as not particularly attached, all choosing either
moderately attached (19 owners) or very attached (65 owners).
Owners of cats and dogs did not differ in terms of attachment, but dogs were
seen as different in terms of behaviour, eg more playful, affectionate, active,
and confident when faced with unfamiliar situations than cats.
Actual dogs were measured against an ideal, and were found to be less confident,
less obedient, and not as happy about being left alone, and more affectionate,
excitable and active than ideal dogs. Actual cats were seen as less confident,
affectionate, playful, obedient, and intelligent than ideal cats, and more
excitable and aggressive towards their owners and others they knew.
The ‘ideal’ ratings of cats and dogs was not significantly different
between very attached and moderately attached owners. Very attached owners,
however, saw dogs as more intelligent, and cats as noisier than moderately
attached owners. While moderately attached owners of dogs seemed generally
less satisfied with their behaviour of their dogs, moderately attached cat
owners seemed more satisfied with some aspects of their cats’ behaviour,
such as how energetic they were, compared to their ideals.
The length of time someone owns a pet, and where the pet comes from can affect
attachment levels, and these variables were controlled for in this study.
Cat owners rated their cats as less intelligent than dogs. They were also
not seen as significantly cleaner, quieter or more able to tolerate being
left alone than dogs, though this may be linked to their having come from
a shelter. Dogs tended to diverge from the ideal in terms of needing more
affection and being worried about being alone - which may also be linked to
their coming from a shelter. Aggression was not seen as a problem with dogs,
which may be because shelters are wary of rehoming dogs showing signs of aggression.
Owner-directed aggression is not common in cats, and again the prevalence
of this problem in the sample could be linked to cats having been given up
to shelters because of such aggression.
There was no link between ideal views of cats and dogs and levels of attachment,
so lack of attachment does not appear to be linked to unrealistic expectations.
‘Actual’ ratings for most behaviour also did not appear to be linked
to attachment levels, though noisier cats and more intelligent dogs seemed
to have owners that were more attached. Absolute levels of behaviour may not
be important for owners. However, average discrepancies between ’ideal’
and ‘actual’ ratings was linked to attachment levels, especially
for dogs. This may be because dogs’ behaviour has more of an effect on
owners, due to dogs being bigger and interacting more with owners.
More research is needed, since the numbers of moderately attached owners
were small, but there does appear to be a link between the behaviour of pets
and how attached their owners are, especially where dogs are concerned. This
is worth looking into, since more attached owners are more likely to keep
rather than abandon their pets.
DO,BT
Top
of page
An experimental study of the effects of play upon the
dog-human relationship
Effects of playing tug of war with Golden retrievers
source: Nicola J Rooney and John W.S. Bradshaw
Applied Animal Behaviour Science vol 75, 2002
starts p161, 16 pages long
Play is often seen as having a major effect on relationships between humans
and dogs, and owners are often advised not to play competitive games with
their dogs, and not to allow the dogs to win tug-of-war games. However, there
is some evidence indicating that play behaviour reflects dominance relationships,
rather than affecting dominance. Dominance refers to who seeks to gain control
over access to resources, and this can vary from one resource to another,
and is affected by context.
Golden retrievers were used in an experiment to see whether winning or losing
tug games affected dogs’ relationships with humans. There were 11 bitches
and 3 dogs in the sample. The 14 dogs were first rated for playfulness and
dominance. The dominance tests included testing the dogs’ reactions to
being called, asked to sit, being groomed, being stared at, and being told
to give up a toy. Owners had trained their dogs to respond to the commands
beforehand. The dogs were also tested for playfulness, and the four least
playful were removed from the sample for some of the analysis. The dogs were
divided into two groups, balanced according to how their owners rated them
for playfulness and dominance, as well as sex and age. One group played 24
games where they won most of the time (at least two thirds wins), and the
other group played 24 games where they lost most of the time. The groups were
then tested for dominance and swapped roles, so the first group was made to
lose, and the second permitted to win. Then the dogs were again tested for
dominance.
All the dogs showed greater obedient attentiveness and demandingness after
playing, though this could be because they had become more familiar with the
experimenter, who was always the same person.
Dogs that were always allowed to win did not appear to increase their confidence
and become more dominant, nor did dogs that were always made to lose decrease
their confidence and become less dominant. However, dogs were more likely
to show playful attention seeking if they were permitted to win, compared
with when they were made to lose. They also showed a higher degree of involvement
if they were permitted to win. Other studies using other animals show that
they appear to enjoy playing more when they can win, and the dogs’ greater
degree of motivation may help explain their seeking attention from their play
partner after being able to win 20 times.
Play between animals of the same species tends not to affect dominance, and
dogs tend to be less competitive toward humans when they play, than they are
in games with other dogs. Some humans, and some dogs have difficulty in assessing
whether interactions are play, and they need to be able to give out and understand
play signals to do so. A dog that is unable to recognise play may become more
dominant by being allowed to win tug games. It may be that only a small proportion
of dogs are likely to become dominant, if allowed to win tug games. Other
studies have looked at different breeds, and generally, playing tug does not
appear to be linked to dominance.
DO,BT
Top
of page
Early socialisation of puppies
Socialising puppies before they have finished their course
of vaccinations
source: Richard Newey
Veterinary Record vol 149 no 25, December 22 2001 p780
The 1991 Dangerous Dogs Act is flawed, and was passed in too much of a hurry,
but early socialisation can help to tackle the problem. Puppies need to get
used to humans of different types, as well as other animals, noises, and other
stimuli. They learn more easily at between one and three-months-old, though
they should stay with their litters until they are about two-months-old. After
that age they need to go out and explore the world.
There is, however, the problem that vaccinations against parvovirus, distemper,
and other diseases aren’t effective until the pup is around 12-weeks-old,
when maternal antibodies have nearly disappeared. Puppies can be vaccinated
at two-months-old, with a second dose at three months, and this provides good
protection after a few days have elapsed from their initial vaccination. Pups
are not likely to encounter infection in most parts of the UK, so the risks
they face are very small.
The organisation Guide Dogs for the Blind has had a policy of vaccinating
in this way, and advising puppy walkers to take the pups out, and this has
also been advised with dogs at a vet practice. No clinical cases of infection
have been seen, and owners and pups appear to have benefited, while the pups
also seem to have grown into dogs that bite less.
DO,BT
Top
of page
The influence of environmental change on the behaviour
of sheltered dogs
Links between shelter dogs’ cage environments, their
behaviour and desirability to potential buyers
source: Deborah L. Wells and Peter G. Hepper
Applies Animal Behaviour Science (68) 2000
starts p151, 12 pages long
Links between dogs’ behaviour, their cage environment, and desirability
to potential purchasers, have been examined at an Ulster Society for the Prevention
of Cruelty to Animals shelter in Northern Ireland. Dogs are more likely to
be bought if they are alert at the front of their pens, and quiet, rather
than asleep at the back of their pens and barking. Potential buyers also find
dogs to be more attractive if the environment is complex.
The sample comprised 120 dogs, studied over a four-hour period. Most dogs
in the sample were aged between one and five-years-old, and crossbreeds, found
wandering as strays. Three changes were made, they had more social stimulation,
the bed at the front rather than the back of their cages, and a toy bone suspended
at the front. The dogs’ behaviour was affected by having the bed at the
front of their pens, and by more social stimulation, in that they spent more
time at the front. They also tended to be more alert with more social stimulation.
Alertness was little affected by having the bed at the front. The dogs tended
to use their beds more when the beds were at the back of the cages. The dogs
tended to bark a little more when there was more social stimulation, but not
when the bed was at the front. Having a toy at the front had little effect
on behaviour, either in terms of whether the dog was at the front, or levels
of alertness, nor did it have an effect on barking.
Sales of these shelter dogs increased with all three measures. An increase
in social stimulation produced the greatest change in behaviour, and boosted
sales more than either of the other two changes. The increase in barking did
not appear to put potential buyers off, and in any case was only slight. Curiously,
sales increased when toys were present, though this did not actually affect
the dogs’ behaviour, rather it affected potential buyers’ perceptions
of the dogs. Presence of a toy, in fact, increased sales more than having
a bed at the front.
Shelters could place toys in dogs’ cages in order to make them appear
more attractive, and could have shorter visiting hours so that the dogs have
more social stimulation when the potential buyers do arrive, so the dogs are
more likely to appear at the front of their cages, and look more alert, so
have more chance of being adopted.
DO,BT
Top
of page
Determination of behavioural traits of pure-bred dogs
using factor analysis and cluster analysis; a comparison of studies in the US
and UK
UK survey of dog breeds and behaviour compared to one
carried out in the US
source: J.W.S. Bradshaw and D. Goodwin
Research in Veterinary Science 1998 (66)
starts p 73, 4 pages long
There are some differences between certain breeds in the US and UK, as is
evident from comparing data from two surveys. The first survey was carried
out in the US by Hart and Hart, published in the Journal of the American Veterinary
Medical Association (186) pp1811-1815, in 1985. The UK data, from a 1990s
survey, studied 49 breeds, 36 of which were also studied by Hart and Hart,
and 24 of which showed similar characteristics in terms of ease of housetraining,
reactivity and aggressivity, as the same breeds in the US. Nine breeds showed
significant differences, and an additional three showed smaller differences.
The UK questionnaire had 13 items in common with the US questionnaire, and
covered traits such as playfulness, barking, and snapping at children. Four
factors were developed from these questions, aggressiveness, reactivity, immaturity
and housetrainability. No significant breed separation was found for trainability
with the UK data, so this question was discarded. This UK/US difference may
be because the UK question on trainability had a vaguer wording than did the
US question.
Questions on watchdog behaviour, territoriality, aggression to dogs, and
dominance in relation to owner were used to develop the aggressivity factor.
Demands for affection, excitability and excess barking were seen as reactivity.
Snapping at children was seen as both aggressive and reactive. General activity,
destructiveness and playfulness were seen as immaturity, and ease of housebreaking
is self explanatory.
Clusters of factor combinations were developed to compare UK and US findings,
with just three factors, aggressivity, reactivity and ease of housetraining,
used to develop the clusters. Cluster 1, for example, was comprised of dogs
with medium aggression, low housetrainability, and medium to high reactivity,
and included Yorkshire Terriers, Pomeranians, Cocker Spaniels, and Pekineses
in both countries. Cluster two combined low aggression, low housetrainability,
and low to medium reactivity, and included Bassett Hounds in both countries.
Cluster three combined high aggression, low to medium housetrainability, and
low to medium reactivity, and included Chows and Great Danes in both countries.
Cluster four was comprised of dogs with low to medium aggression, medium to
high housetrainability, and high reactivity, and included English Springer
Spaniels, and Miniature and Toy Poodles in both countries. Cluster five was
comprised of dogs showing low to medium aggression, medium to high housetrainability,
and low to medium reactivity, and included Labrador Retrievers, Golden Retrievers,
and Rough Collies, in both countries. Cluster six was comprised of dogs showing
very high aggression, housetrainability levels of high or very high, and low
reactivity, and included Rottweilers, German Shepherds, and Dobermanns in
both countries. Cluster seven was comprised of dogs showing high aggression,
medium housetrainability, and medium to high reactivity, and included Fox
Terriers, West Highland White Terriers, and Cairn Terriers, in both countries.
Nine breeds showed significant differences in terms of reactivity and aggression.
Airedale Terriers, Beagles and Standard Poodles were seen as showing medium
to low reactivity in the UK, but high in the US. Corgis and Old English Sheepdogs
(OES) were classed as showing high aggression in the UK, and medium (Corgis)
and very low (OES) in the US. Irish setters were seen as showing low aggression
in the UK, medium in the US, while Dalmations were seen as having medium to
low aggression in the UK, and high in the US. Boxers and Samoyeds were seen
as medium in terms of reactivity in the UK, and low in the US.
These perceived differences could have arisen for a number of reasons, including
how dogs are socialized and portrayed in the media in each country, and differences
between individuals of the same breed. There do, however, appear to be a number
of real differences between the same breed in the UK and US, which may be
due to relative genetic isolation. These differences are important when discussing
breeds and behaviour at an international level.
DO,BT
Top
of page
Mandy's new best friend, Bobby, vies to be top Labour
dog
Behaviour of dogs owned by British Labour party politicians
source: Jonathan Carr-Brown
Independent on Sunday December 19 1999 p12
Lucy, the guide dog owned by British secretary of state for education, David
Blunkett, has a new rival in the form of Bobby, a golden retriever owned by
Peter Mandelson. Blunkett has given some advice to Mandelson on the need to
be firm with his pet. He has told Mandelson to perceive Bobby as a member
of the Militant tendency. Blunkett had to obtain permission to allow Lucy
to be admitted to the House of Commons chamber. She usually behaves exceptionally
well, sleeping by Blunkett's feet during his best speeches. She has vomited
once, when the former spokesman on education for the Conservative party, David
Willetts, was giving a speech. Bobby had to be removed from a Northern Ireland
press reception following an accident affecting the carpet. Bobby has travelled
to Belfast using the ministerial jet. Lord Hattersley is another Labour politician
who owns a dog. His dog, Buster, is a Staffordshire bull terrier-German shepherd
cross from Battersea Dogs Home. Buster once killed a goose in London's St
James's Park.
DO,BT
Top
of page
Sniffing danger
How a dog uses its nose
source: Mark Schrope
New Scientist August 26 2000 p16
Researcher, Gary Settles, from Penn State University, has studied how dogs
sniff. He found that they breathe in cool air, exhaling it as warm air, and
this exhaled air is diverted away from the object they are sniffing. Dogs
exhale through the side slits of their noses, so the exhaled air can be directed
away from what the dog is sniffing. The scent can thus be separated from the
air exhaled by the dog, while new air is pulls across the object, which makes
odour molecules rise in the air. Dogs alter the shapes of their noses on inhaling,
so as to be able to inhale large amounts of air. Settles carred out his research
following a request by the military. This finding could help with developing
mechanical dogs to locate landmines.
DO,BT
Top
of page
Watch it! My growl is as bad as my bite
Growl frequency patterns and bite severity in dogs appear
to be linked
source: New Scientist October 23 1999 p29
Researchers have found that the severity of a dog's bite can be gauged from
its growl. Tecumseh Fitch from Harvard, Massachusetts, and Tobias Riede from
Humboldt University, Germany, have measured growl frequency patterns for 21
breeds. The growls of larger dogs tend to show formants that are more narrowly
spaced, whatever the dog's head shape (Journal of Experimental Biology, vol
202, p2859). Dogs may assess each other's strength using this information.
DO,BT
Top
of page
Mind of a dog
Research on problem solving abilities of dogs and their
attachment to humans
source: Kate Douglas
New Scientist March 4 2000
starts p22, 5 pages long
Research carried out at Eotvos Lorand University, Budapest, Hungary, by Vilmos
Csanyi and his team, has investigated bonds between humans and dogs. Dogs
show a similar attachment to their owners as human infants show to their mothers.
Domestication can bring both obedience and and apparent loss of problem solving
and other cognitive abilities. Dogs have smaller brains than wolves, especially
the parts linked to smell and hearing, but they can make mental maps and understand
object permanence.
The researchers found that dogs that have strong bonds with owners were worse
at problem solving unless encouraged in the task by the owner. Guide dogs
for the blind have strong bonds and good problem solving ablities, and have
been trained to take control. They normally leave decisions to their owner,
and take control in an emergency. Domestication involves producing animals
with a predisposition to obey rules, as a result of selection. Play helps
dogs learn codes of conduct from humans, argues University of Colorado's Marc
Bekoff. He sees dogs as more cognitive than wolves.
Budapest researcher, Adam Miklosi, has found that dogs develop an ability
to understand human gaze cues. Four-year-old dogs understand human cues better
than cues from other dogs, while six-month old dogs respond to dog cues, and
not to human cues. The Budapest group is also examining how well dogs understand
language. Mature pets can understand between from 7 to 80 expressions, with
an average of 40.
DO,BT
Top
of page
Fido stays faithful to the end
Dogs remember their original owners from puppyhood
source: New Scientist July 10 1999 p25
Dogs can remember their original owners for as long as nine years after they
have been separated from them. William Carr is a biologist from Beaver College,
Pensylvania. He has carried out research on dogs that went to live with new
families as puppies, to see whether they remember their original owners. The
dogs investigated the scent of their original owners for significantly longer
than they did other people who looked after a dog of the same breed. Carr
reported his findings to the Animal Behaviour Society at Lewisburg, US.
DO,BT
Top
of page
Dogs are a bunch of clever-clogs
Dogs may be aware of what their owners are looking at
source: Claire Ainsworth
New Scientist December 16 2000 p20
Researchers at the Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, Germany,
have examined the behaviour of dogs to assess whether it changes if dogs are
being watched. Dogs were left with treats in front of them that they were
told not to eat. The dogs usually obeyed, until the person went out of the
room, and then rapidly ate the treats. The researchers also tested dogs to
see if they were more likely to steal the treats when someone was present
and not looking at them, and found that this was the case. Different levels
of distraction were tested, with the person's eyes shut, or the person using
a computer, for example. The dogs used different strategies according to how
distracted the person appeared to be. They were more likely to use an indirect
approach, rather than going directly to the treat, if the person appeared
to be looking at the dog, and less likely to if the person was playing on
a computer. Dogs can work out what humans are able to see, and may be able
to put together their past experiences to solve new problems. Dog behaviour
appears more complex than simply automatic responses that are learnt.
DO,BT
Top
of page
RSPCA challenge police over cruel dog collars
RSPCA concerned about electronic training collars used
by police
source: Jo Dillon
Independent on Sunday Feburary 13 2000 p9
The RSPCA oppose the usage of electronic training collars, arguing that rewards
should be used for training. The collars can be used to punish dogs with an
electric shock, and are still used by police forces in Britain. The military
police, Prison Service, and Customs and Excise have prohibited the collars.
Campaigners argue that other methods, such as vibrating collars, or citrus
sprays, could replace electronic collars.
DO,BT
Top
of page
German dogs get English lessons as police seek canine
recruits abroad
British police recruit dogs abroad due to shortage of
dogs in Britain
source: Sophie Goodchild
Independent on Sunday December 31 2000 p1
The British police have had to recruit German Shepherd dogs from France and
Belgium due to a shortage of dogs in Britain. The British public used to donate
enough puppies, but puppy donations fell after three police dog handlers were
convicted of cruelty in Essex, England, in 1998. Private security firms also
compete for dogs. Some police forces are using rottweilers in place of German
shepherds. Dog behaviourist and trainer, Tony Lockyer, from Devon, England,
argues that rottweilers learn to bite more easily than do German shepherds,
but take a long time to learn to stop biting.
DO,BT
Top
of page
Police dogs are too cowardly, officers admit
British police chief claims German shepherds are being
bred more cowardly
source: Jason Bennetto
Independent February 3 2001 p4
Phil Tyson, a police dog handler from West Yorkshire, England, argues that
dog shows have led to German shepherds becoming less bold and suspicious.
Tyson says that it is also not unusual for German shepherds to have hip problems.
He sees the defect as bred into them due to their usage as show dogs. He is
using a Belgian malinois bitch in place of a German shepherd. Malinois are
used by the police in Germany and the Netherlands, and are being tried out
by a number of British police forces.
The Association of Chief Police Officers (Apco) has a sub-committee which
deals with dog handling, and which has met to tackle the problem of a shortage
of police dogs. The committee attributes the German shepherd shortage to competition
with private security firms, and to poor breeding. The secretary, Superintendent
Clive Helliwell, argues that German shepherds have had courage and drive bred
out of them over 30 years. Apco is carrying out research on breeding and usage
of other types of dogs. Dobermanns and rottweilers are seen as too unpredictable.
German shepherds were first used by the Metropolitan police in 1956, and the
Met has 180 of these dogs, with 30 other dogs, including springer and cocker
spaniels and labradors, used as sniffer dogs.
DO,BT
Top
of page
Police dog's bite fails to live up to its bark
Police argue that breeders have made German shepherds
less bold
source: Angelique Chrisafis
Guardian February 3 2001 p8
West Yorkshire police spokesman, Phil Tyson, has told 'Police Review' that
dog shows have meant that German shepherds have become less bold and so less
suitable for police work. Shows tend to seek nice, subdued dogs, he argues,
rather than aggression. The head of the dog training school for West Yorkshire
is Graham Armitage, who states that other breeds considered include Rhodesian
ridgebacks, rottweilers, and dobermans, though it has been decided not to
use Japanese akitas. Police officers have travelled to Belgium to purchase
malinois dogs, a type of Belgian shepherd dog that is smaller than a German
shepherd. The Kennel Club breeders' association's Phil Buckley argues that
breeders' guidelines for German shepherds are that the breed should be courageous
and not nervous.
DO,BT
Top
of page
|
